<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Outliers &#187; blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-outliers.com/category/blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-outliers.com</link>
	<description>a critical look at data visualisation, information aesthetics, and design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 11:34:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why The Outliers Is Here #4: Less is more. Let&#8217;s reduce the information load, not increase it.</title>
		<link>http://the-outliers.com/2009/09/why-the-outliers-is-here-4-less-is-more-lets-reduce-the-information-load-not-increase-it/</link>
		<comments>http://the-outliers.com/2009/09/why-the-outliers-is-here-4-less-is-more-lets-reduce-the-information-load-not-increase-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrea</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data visualisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-outliers.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a little counter-intuitive, I know (with all of us creating craploads of digital/physical/neurological&#8230; data a day), but bear with me.
It&#8217;s about moving up the data-to-wisdom hierarchy, not across it.

Let&#8217;s say that each visualisation project is a data point. Currently, some visualisation blogs out there reproduce data, ie: infosthetics and visual complexity, which is fine, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a little counter-intuitive, I know (with all of us creating craploads of digital/physical/neurological&#8230; data a day), but bear with me.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s about moving up the <a href="http://www.systems-thinking.org/dikw/dikw.htm" target="_blank">data-to-wisdom hierarchy</a>, not across it.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-34" title="data_to_wisdom" src="http://the-outliers.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/data_to_wisdom.gif" alt="data_to_wisdom" width="500" height="500" /></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say that each visualisation project is a data point. Currently, some visualisation blogs out there <em>reproduce data</em>, ie: <a href="http://infosthetics.com/" target="_blank">infosthetics</a> and <a href="http://www.visualcomplexity.com/vc/" target="_blank">visual complexity</a>, which is fine, because they provide a great one-stop-shop for (almost!) every datavis project ever done. (There is, however, <em>information</em> found in the categorisation of these projects).</p>
<p>On the other hand, you have <a href="http://flowingdata.com/" target="_blank">Flowing Data</a>, which <em>moves up the hierarchy</em> a little by presenting lists, grouping relevant visualisations, and introducing extra information not present in the data.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try my best to bring information, insights and knowledge rather than data.</p>
<p>*an illustration of <a href="http://www.nancymargulies.com/datatowisdomcloseup.htm" target="_blank">data to wisdom</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://the-outliers.com/2009/09/why-the-outliers-is-here-4-less-is-more-lets-reduce-the-information-load-not-increase-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
